Health Communications Research Paper on Hurricane Katrina Essay

Health communications Research Paper on Hurri jakese Katrina - Essay ExampleEarthquake stroke Kobe Japan a approximately years ago killing 200,000 people. True, however is the recent ruthless, Hurricane Katrina hit of Louisiana and Mississippi Gulf rim August 29, as a Category 4 hurricane with sustained winds of 145 mph It flooded 90,000 squ ar(a) miles displacing 400,000 people. 1 The official death toll now stands at 1,302 and the damage estimated from $70 to $130 billion. match to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) over one million persons were displaced, and hundreds of thousands remain dispersed throughout the U.S. including some 200,000 people staying in 65,000 rooms in 10,000 hotels or motels nationwide. Additional thousands are reportedly shut up housed in Texas churches. Forty-three states are now eligible for federal assistance to help meet unavoidably of evacutees. More than 200,000 people also lost their jobs across the affected Gulf region. However, e xperience from the historical disasters has establish a dichotomy between disaster and peoples resilience. People have been able to adapt very scratch line by embarking on reconstruction regardless of the impact.In the wake of Katrina for example resilience has gained a wise relevance. Relatively, resilience and catastrophes are two inseparable entities that depend on demographics and the impact of the devastation. Just as some people can fend off traumatic illness while others succumb, non all cities are equally of rebounding from a shock to the system. A person whose health is compromised to begin with, has less chance of recuperation than an individual in full health. So too is a city. New Orleans, which already was burdened with commodious social and economic problems long before Katrina arrival have played a major consumption in determining how well the Crescent City will recover from the storm and its aftermath. Urban resilience, moreover, is not necessarily progressive . In spite of the seeming tabular Rasa opportunity a major disaster can offer to correct old errors and put things right, reconstruction tends to favor the status quo. Even if city buildings are toppled, foundations are often reusable and property lines remain. Insurance claims and simple inertia help push landowners to make more or less what they lost. The deep psychological need to see things put quickly back up the way they were has also had a positive impact on resiliency and thereof reconstruction. While a disaster can trigger a host of long-term innovations, these tend not to surface in the immediate wake of a catastrophe. Visionary schemes have been the stuff of good times, when people can cave in the luxury of debating possible future. The last thing people want to do in the middle of a disaster is wait around for the minute of a brave new plan to be supple for implementation. When London burned in 1666, Christopher Wren, John Evelyns and others, full of axial boulevards and capacious plazas all remained on paper, floated talkative schemes. What Londoners returned to instead, was a city that looked and felt much as it did before the conflagration. And while Chicago great push aside of 1871 eventually yielded a city of fire-proof masonry buildings as well as the first skyscrapers, the initial reconstruction configuration fell back to erecting very kinds of rickety firetraps that caused the catastrophe in the first place. This notion of regressive resilience extends also to a city social order and